Service contracts: retailers.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the sale of service contracts obligating the service contractor to provide to the buyer of the product, without additional charge, all of the services and functional parts that may be necessary to maintain proper operation of the product and service for the duration of the contract, except as specified. Existing law imposes specified requirements on the terms of a service contract. This bill would require a retailer that sells a service contract, during the period that the service contract is in effect, to (1) maintain contract information that includes a description of the terms and conditions of the service contract, and provide that information to the purchaser of the service contract or other beneficiary upon request, or (2) obtain a copy of the service contract upon request from the purchaser of the service contract or other beneficiary, and provide that copy to the requester within 10 business days after receiving the request. This requirement would not apply to a vehicle service contract, as defined.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2008
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Mar 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Signed into Law
Aug 2009
Introduced Dec 9, 2008
Signed Aug 6, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 22, 2009 · Assembly Mar 23, 2009
How they voted
25–10
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 36
Jun 22, 2009
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican13
76% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Aug 5, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 22, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-10-1)
senate
Jun 9, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 9).
upper
May 26, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Apr 30, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 23, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (36-24-2)
assembly
Mar 17, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (March 17).
lower
Feb 5, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Dec 10, 2008
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 9.
lower
Dec 9, 2008
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TM
Tony Mendoza
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 63
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 63. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline