AB 595 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Placement of children: criminal background checks.

Summary
(1) Existing law, the California Community Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of community care facilities, including foster family homes and foster family agencies, by the State Department of Social Services. Violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. Existing law requires a criminal record check of applicants for a license, special permit, or certificate of approval for a foster family home or certified family home, and other persons, including nonclients who reside in those homes and staff and employees. Existing law requires that an application be denied, unless the Director of Social Services grants an exemption, if it is found that the applicant or any of the other designated persons has been convicted of prescribed crimes. This bill would prohibit the State Department of Social Services or other approving authority from issuing a license or certificate of approval to any foster family home or certified family home applicant who has not obtained both a California and Federal Bureau of Investigation criminal record clearance or an exemption from disqualification, as prescribed. This bill would, to the same extent required for federal funding, effective October 1, 2008, prohibit the director from granting an exemption where a foster care provider applicant or any of the other designated persons have been convicted of certain felonies at any time and other felonies in the previous 5 years. This bill would prohibit exemptions under these circumstances for foster care providers, as specified, in those homes where the individual has been convicted of murder or voluntary manslaughter. (2) Existing law sets forth circumstances under which a minor may be adjudged a dependent child of the juvenile court, and establishes procedures to determine the temporary placement of a dependent child. Existing law requires a county social worker to visit the home of a relative or prospective guardian who is not a licensed or certified foster parent, prior to placing the child in that home, to ascertain the appropriateness of the placement. Existing law also requires the court or county social worker to initiate a state and federal criminal records check through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System as part of their assessment. Existing law provides that these provisions shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2010, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2010, deletes or extends that date. This bill would prohibit placement of the child in the home of a person if the criminal records check indicates the person has been convicted of a crime that the Director of Social Services cannot grant an exemption for with respect to foster family home and certified family home applicants. This bill would also prohibit placement of a child in the home of a person who has been convicted of a crime that the Director of Social Services may grant an exemption for unless a criminal records exemption has been granted by the county, based on substantial and convincing evidence, to support a reasonable belief that the person with the criminal conviction is of such good character as to justify the placement and not present a risk of harm to the child. This bill would repeal the provisions relating to the sunset and repeal of these existing law provisions. To the extent this bill would impose additional duties on county welfare departments, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 25, 2009 Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 17, 2009 · Assembly Jun 1, 2009

How they voted

35–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 40
Aug 17, 2009
D Democratic25
21 Yea 4
84% Yea
R Republican15
14 Yea 1
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
25
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 17, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-5)
senate
Jul 14, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (July 13).
upper
Jun 30, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Committee
Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 24, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and PUB. S.
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0-1)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
May 20, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 12, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 12).
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
AA
Anthony Adams
RRepublican
CA
59