Sex offenders: restrictions.
Summary
Existing law makes it unlawful for a person who is required to register as a sex offender to reside within 2,000 feet of a public or private school, or park where children regularly gather. Existing law also provides that any person required to register as a sex offender who comes into any school building or upon any school ground without lawful business and written permission is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would make it a misdemeanor for certain high-risk sex offenders, except in limited instances, to be physically present and delay, linger, or idle about within 100 feet of a sensitive use site, as defined. For purposes of those provisions, a sensitive use site would include specified places where children gather, including bus stops, child care centers, sports centers, and schools. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Last action Feb 2, 2010
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Jan 12, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Jan 4, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 4, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 12, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
NT
Norma Torres
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 575
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 575. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline