Charter schools.
Summary
(1) The Ralph M. Brown Act requires that all meetings of a legislative body, as defined, of a local agency be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend unless a closed session is authorized. The Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act requires, with specified exceptions, that all meetings of a state body be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend. This bill would expressly state that a charter school is subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act, unless it is operated by an entity governed by the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, in which case the school would be subject to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act. (2) The California Public Records Act requires state and local agencies to make their records available for public inspection and to make copies available upon request and payment of a fee unless they are exempt from disclosure. This bill would expressly state that a charter school is subject to the California Public Records Act. (3) Existing law prohibits certain public officials, including, but not limited to, members of governing boards of school districts and citizens' oversight committees, from engaging in specified activities that are inconsistent or incompatible with, or inimical to, their duties as public officials, including, but not limited to, entering into a contract in which the official or the official's family member has a financial interest, as specified. This bill would expressly state that a charter school is subject to these provisions. (4) The Political Reform Act of 1974 requires every state agency and local governmental agency to adopt a conflict-of-interest code, formulated at the most decentralized level possible, that requires designated employees of the agency to file statements of economic interest disclosing any investments, business positions, interests in real property, or sources of income that may foreseeably be affected materially by any governmental decision made or participated in by the designated employee by virtue of his or her position. This bill would expressly state that a charter school is subject to the Political Reform Act of 1974. (5) This bill would state various exceptions and clarifications regarding the applicability of the acts described in (1) to (4) , inclusive. (6) Existing law requires a member of the governing board of a school district to abstain from voting on personnel matters that uniquely affect a relative of the member. This bill would expressly authorize an individual to serve as a member of the governing body of a charter school and be employed in a separate position at that charter school. The bill would require a member of the governing body of a charter school to abstain from voting on any matter affecting his or her own employment or any personnel matter that uniquely affects a relative of the member. (7) The bill would make these provisions operative on July 1, 2011.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Vetoed Sep 23, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2010 · Assembly May 28, 2009
How they voted
21–13
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 38
Aug 24, 2010
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
9
Sep 23, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 26, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 6709.)
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-13-4)
senate
Aug 24, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 2, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Jul 7, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and to third reading.
upper
Jul 6, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 1).
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 22, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 17, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 17).
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on ED. and JUD.
upper
May 28, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-27)
assembly
May 7, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 5, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 12, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JB
Julia Brownley
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 572
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 572. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline