Highway workers: assault and battery.
Summary
Existing law establishes the offense of assault against a highway worker engaged in the performance of his or her duties, where "highway worker" is defined as an employee or contractor of the Department of Transportation engaged in specified activities related to state highways. This bill would expand the definition of highway worker for that offense to include employees of a city, county, or city and county, as well as employees of a contractor while working under contract with the Department of Transportation, contractors and employees of contractors while working under contract with a city, county, or city and county, and volunteers, as defined, and to include additional specified activities related to local roads or streets. Existing law establishes the offense of battery against a highway worker engaged in the performance of his or her duties, where "highway worker" is defined as an employee or contractor of the Department of Transportation engaged in specified activities related to state highways. This bill would expand the definition of highway worker for that offense to include employees of a city, county, or city and county, as well as employees of a contractor while working under contract with the Department of Transportation, contractors and employees of contractors while working under contract with a city, county, or city and county, and volunteers, as defined, and to include additional specified activities related to local roads or streets. By expanding the scope of existing offenses, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Jul 2009
Signed into Law
Aug 2009
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Signed Aug 6, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jul 9, 2009 · Assembly Jul 13, 2009
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 36
Jul 9, 2009
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Aug 5, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 13, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-0-1)
assembly
Jul 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2471.)
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-5)
senate
Jul 9, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 16, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 15, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 9).
upper
May 14, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 22).
lower
Apr 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 31).
lower
Mar 12, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WA
Wilmer Amina Carter
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 561
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 561. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline