AB 548 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Education finance: Class Size Reduction Program.

Summary
(1) Existing law establishes the Class Size Reduction Program, under which a participating school district or county office of education reduces class size to 20 pupils per class in kindergarten and grades 1 to 3, inclusive. If a school district or county office of education receives funding for a class, but fails to reduce the size of that class to 20 pupils, the school district or county office of education incurs a reduction in its next principal apportionment of state funds. Existing law provides that for the 2008–09, 2009–10, 2010–11, and 2011–12 fiscal years, a local educational agency is eligible to receive funding for the same number of classes for which it had applied to receive program funding as of January 31, 2009. This bill would provide that, for the 2008–09 school year, a local educational agency may choose for state apportionment purposes the option to receive funding for the same number of classes for which it had applied to receive program funding as of January 31, 2009, or the funding option provided under the Class Size Reduction Program on December 31, 2008, prior to the enactment of the provision referenced above. This bill would provide that, for the 2009–10 school year, the Riverside Unified School District may choose to operate each of its grade 3 classrooms that participate in the Class Size Reduction Program either pursuant to the option to receive funding for the same number of classes for which it had applied to receive program funding as of January 31, 2009, or the funding option provided under the Class Size Reduction Program on December 31, 2008, prior to the enactment of the provision referenced above. (2) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Riverside Unified School District. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status failed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 25, 2009 Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 3, 2009

How they voted

600
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 62
Jun 3, 2009
D Democratic38
36 Yea 2
94% Yea
R Republican24
24 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
30
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Amendments
3
Jul 15, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.
upper
Jun 23, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 15, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 11, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Mar 1, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10 (c).
upper
Jan 4, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Jul 14, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (July 13).
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 1).
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Jun 3, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-0-2)
assembly
Jun 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 29, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 15).
lower
Mar 12, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors

Sponsors