Emergency telephone system: abuse.
Summary
Under existing law, any person who knowingly allows the use of, or who uses, the 911 telephone system for any reason other than because of an emergency is guilty of an infraction. This bill would authorize an entity that provides emergency medical services to report a violation of this law to the public safety entity that originally received the call. The bill would require the public safety entity originally receiving the call, if the public safety entity has verified that a violation has occurred, to issue the applicable warnings and citations, as specified. By imposing new duties on local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Jul 2009
Vetoed
Aug 2009
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Vetoed Aug 17, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jul 9, 2009 · Assembly Jul 16, 2009
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 36
Jul 9, 2009
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
4
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Aug 17, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Aug 5, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Jul 16, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (56-0-5)
assembly
Jul 16, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 2537.)
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-5)
senate
Jul 9, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 10, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 9, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 9).
upper
May 14, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 22).
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 31).
lower
Mar 12, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 538
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 538. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline