Local government: reorganization: expenditure reporting.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act, requires contributions and expenditures for political purposes on boundary changes approved by a local agency formation commission to be disclosed and reported to the commission to the same extent and subject to the same requirements of the Political Reform Act of 1974 as provided for local initiative measures. This bill would revise these provisions to require the expenditures to be disclosed and reported pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974. (2) Existing law, for purposes of the Political Reform Act of 1974, defines "LAFCO proposal" to mean a proposal, as defined by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act, that is initiated as a petition for filing with a local agency formation commission. This bill would revise the definition of "LAFCO proposal" to mean a proposal, as defined by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act, including a proceeding, as defined by that act. (3) The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Signed into Law
Aug 2009
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Signed Aug 6, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 24, 2009 · Assembly Jul 6, 2009
How they voted
39–0
Passed
Total votes 39
Jun 24, 2009
D
Democratic25
100% Yea
R
Republican14
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
4
Aug 5, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 6, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-1)
assembly
Jul 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2381.)
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0)
senate
Jun 24, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 17, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (June 17).
upper
Jun 9, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
May 21, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
May 5, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 5).
lower
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 1, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and E. & R.
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JS
Jim Silva
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 528
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 528. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline