Privacy.
Summary
Existing law provides that a person is liable for constructive invasion of privacy when the defendant attempts to capture, in a manner that is offensive to a reasonable person, or knowingly trespasses or commits assault with the intent to capture, as specified, any type of visual image, sound recording, or other physical impression of the plaintiff engaging in a personal or familial activity under circumstances in which the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of privacy, through the use of a visual or auditory enhancing device, as specified. The person who commits the act is liable for up to 3 times the amount of general and special damages, and may be liable for punitive damages. However, the sale, transmission, publication, broadcast, or use of any image or recording of the type, or under the circumstances, described does not itself constitute a violation of that provision. This bill would create an exception to the latter provision regarding the first sale, offer for sale, transmission, publication, broadcast, or other use of any visual image, sound recording, or other physical impression, if the person sold, transmitted, published, broadcast, or used any image or recording of the type described in the provision above with actual knowledge, as defined, that the images or recordings were obtained in violation of specified provisions and provided compensation, consideration, or remuneration, monetary or otherwise, for the rights to the unlawfully obtained visual image, sound recording, or other physical impression. The bill would specify that those provisions apply only to a visual image, sound recording, or other physical impression that is captured or taken in California after January 1, 2010. The bill would also make technical changes. The bill would provide that a person who violates the provisions described above, or who directs, solicits, actually induces, or actually causes another person to violate any of those provisions would be subject to a civil fine of not less than $5,000 and not more than $50,000. The bill would authorize a county counsel or a city attorney to recover those civil fines, as specified. The bill would specify the allocation of the fines collected pursuant to the foregoing provision, including 12 to the prosecuting agency. The bill would also establish the Arts and Entertainment Fund in the State Treasury for the deposit of 12 of the fines, for expenditure by the California Arts Council, upon appropriation by the Legislature, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 8, 2009 · Assembly Jun 2, 2009
How they voted
23–13
Passed
Total votes 36
Sep 8, 2009
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
8
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 57. Noes 20. Page 3261.)
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 8, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-13)
senate
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 14).
upper
Jul 6, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-11-10)
assembly
May 19, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 18, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (May 12).
lower
May 4, 2009
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 30, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RULES by unanimous consent.
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 12, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 524
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 524. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline