AB 515 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Collateral recovery: tow vehicles.

Summary
(1) Existing law, the Collateral Recovery Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of repossession agencies by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services under the supervision and control of the Director of Consumer Affairs. Any person who violates these provisions is guilty of a crime punishable by fine and imprisonment. The act requires an applicant for a qualification certificate to satisfy specified requirements, including possessing 2 years lawful experience that may include experience recovering collateral as a salaried employee of a financial institution or vehicle dealer and that is to consist of a minimum of 4,000 hours of compensated work. The act requires every repossession agency office to be under the active charge of a qualified certificate holder. The act requires licensees to serve a debtor with a specified notice of seizure after the recovery of collateral by the licensee. This bill would make a tow vehicle that is used to violate the act subject to removal and impoundment. The bill would provide that lawful experience for a qualification certificate does not include any employment performing work other than skip tracing, debt collection, or actual collateral recovery. The bill would specify that a licensee may have more than one qualified certificate holder in an office. The bill would require a licensee's notice provided to a debtor after recovery of collateral to include a disclosure that electrical or tire failure or any damage to, as a result of, or caused by, certain aftermarket parts and accessories on a vehicle shall not be the responsibility of the licensee, except as specified. Because a violation of these provisions by a licensee would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law provides that a peace officer or, in certain other cases, a magistrate, may cause the removal and seizure of a vehicle, as specified. Existing law provides that a vehicle so seized may be impounded for 30 days. Under existing law, a vehicle removed and seized may be released to the legal owner or the legal owner's agent prior to the end of 30 days' impoundment if certain conditions are met, including, but not limited to, the requirement that the legal owner or the legal owner's agent pay all towing and storage fees related to the seizure of the vehicle. This bill would require a law enforcement agency that has impounded a vehicle to remain open to issue a release to the registered owner or legal owner of a vehicle whenever the agency is open to serve the public for regular, nonemergency business. The bill would require specified facilities where impounded vehicles are stored to accept valid bank credit cards, as defined, or cash as payment for towing, storage, and related fees and would make the facility civilly liable, as specified, for a failure to do so. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for a legal owner of an impounded vehicle to knowingly release the vehicle to the registered owner of the vehicle in certain circumstances. The bill would impose additional requirements with respect to the release of an impounded vehicle. By establishing new crimes and imposing new duties on law enforcement agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law imposes various taillamp, stoplamp, turn signal requirements, and multisafety chain requirements applicable to towing vehicles. This bill would delete specified provisions requiring a tow vehicle to use an extension cord to display rear stoplamps and turn signals. The bill would exempt a repossessor's towing vehicle from the multisafety chain requirements applicable to towing vehicles if the repossessor is towing a vehicle no more than one mile on a public highway and the vehicle is secured by one safety chain. (4) This bill would also incorporate additional changes in Section 21100.4 of the Vehicle Code proposed by SB 201, to be operative only if SB 201, and this bill are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is enacted last. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 24, 2009 Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 2, 2009 · Assembly Sep 8, 2009

How they voted

380
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
Sep 2, 2009
D Democratic25
24 Yea 1
96% Yea
R Republican14
14 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
35
Key actions
13
Committee
11
Amendments
6
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0)
assembly
Sep 8, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3086.)
lower
Sep 3, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 5 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 2, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
Aug 17, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 13).
upper
Jul 7, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 6, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 9, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 9).
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 21, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
upper
May 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 6).
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 14).
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and JUD.
lower
Feb 25, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CH
Curt Hagman
RRepublican
CA
55