Net energy metering.
Summary
Existing law relative to private energy producers requires every electric utility, as defined, to make available to an eligible customer‑generator, as defined, a standard contract or tariff for net energy metering on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer‑generators exceeds 2.5% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand. This bill instead would require that the standard contract or tariff for net energy metering be offered on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer‑generators exceeds 5% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand. The bill would require an electrical corporation to include a provision in the net energy metering contract or tariff requiring that any customer with an existing electrical generating facility and meter who enters into a new net energy metering contract to provide an inspection report to the electrical corporation, unless the electrical generating facility and meter have been installed or inspected within the previous 3 years.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jan 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Feb 2010
Signed into Law
Feb 2010
Introduced Feb 24, 2009
Signed Feb 26, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Feb 11, 2010 · Assembly Jun 1, 2009
How they voted
23–5
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 35
Feb 11, 2010
D
Democratic23
73% Yea
R
Republican12
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
10
Committee
11
Amendments
4
Feb 26, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Feb 18, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 61. Noes 4. Page 4072.)
lower
Feb 11, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-5-7)
senate
Feb 11, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after February 13 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jan 27, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 26, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jul 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
upper
Jun 24, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (38-23-1)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 14).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 12, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 25, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 510
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 510. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline