Energy: net energy metering.
Summary
Existing law relative to private energy producers requires every electric utility, as defined, to make available to an eligible customer‑generator, as defined, a standard contract or tariff for net energy metering on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer‑generators exceeds 2.5% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand. This 2.5% limitation is in effect until December 31, 2010, and beginning January 1, 2011, the limitation becomes 5%. Existing law requires the electric utility, upon an affirmative election by the eligible customer-generator to receive service pursuant to this contract or tariff, to either: (1) provide net surplus electricity compensation for any net surplus electricity generated in the 12-month period, or (2) allow the eligible customer-generator to apply the net surplus electricity as a credit for kilowatthours subsequently supplied by the electric utility to the surplus customer-generator. This bill would require, for the purposes of determining whether an agricultural customer-generator using wind or solar electric generation is a net consumer or a net surplus customer-generator during a 12-month period, the electric utility to aggregate the electrical load of the agricultural customer under the same ownership located on property adjacent or contiguous to the generation facility.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2008
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Dec 1, 2008
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2009
How they voted
49–2
Passed · 11 other
Total votes 62
Jun 2, 2009
D
Democratic38
86% Yea
R
Republican24
66% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
6
Aug 12, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jun 30, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
May 17, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jun 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (49-2-11)
assembly
Jun 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 29, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
May 20, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 6, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 4, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & C. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Dec 2, 2008
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 1.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SB
Sam Blakeslee Ph.D.
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 51
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 51. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline