AB 479 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Solid waste: diversion.

Summary
(1) The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, which is administered by the California Integrated Waste Management Board, requires each city, county, and regional agency, if any, to develop a source reduction and recycling element of an integrated waste management plan containing specified components, including a source reduction component, a recycling component, and a composting component. With certain exceptions, the source reduction and recycling element of that plan is required to divert 50% of all solid waste from landfill disposal or transformation by January 1, 2000, through source reduction, recycling, and composting activities. Existing law requires the board to review, at least once every 2 years, a jurisdiction's source reduction and recycling element and household hazardous waste element. The board is required to issue an order of compliance if the board finds that a jurisdiction has failed to implement its source reduction and recycling element or its household hazardous waste element, pursuant to a specified procedure. If, after issuing an order of compliance, the board finds the city, county, or regional agency has failed to make a good faith effort to implement those elements, the board is authorized to impose administrative civil penalties upon the city, county, or regional agency. This bill would require the board, on January 1, 2020, and annually thereafter, to ensure that 75% of all solid waste generated is source reduced, recycled, and composted. The bill would prohibit the board from imposing any enforceable requirements against a local agency or a solid waste enterprise or that includes aspects of solid waste handling that are of local concern to implement this 75% diversion level. (2) Existing law requires a local agency to impose certain requirements on an operator of a large venue or event to facilitate solid waste reduction, reuse, and recycling. This bill would require the owner or operator of a business that contracts for solid waste services and generates more than 4 cubic yards of total solid waste and recyclable materials per week to take specified action by January 1, 2011. The bill would require a jurisdiction to implement a commercial recycling program meeting specified elements but would not require the jurisdiction to revise its source reduction and recycling element if the jurisdiction adds or expands a commercial recycling program to meet this requirement. By requiring a jurisdiction to implement a commercial recycling program, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require to board to review a jurisdiction's compliance with the above requirement as a part of the board's review of a jurisdiction's compliance with the 50% solid waste diversion requirement. The bill would require the board, commencing in 2014 and also in 2019, to conduct a statewide study to measure the amount of greenhouse gas emissions reduction attributable to the implementation of the commercial recycling program. If the board determines that the implementation of the commercial recycling programs is not meeting the greenhouse gas emissions reduction required in the scoping plan adopted by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, the bill would authorize the board to require jurisdictions that have not already done so to adopt a mandatory commercial recycling ordinance. (3) Existing law prohibits an operator of a solid waste facility from making a significant change in the design or operation of the solid waste facility that is not authorized by the existing permit unless the change is approved by the enforcement agency. Existing law requires the enforcement agency, within 60 days of receipt of an application for a revised permit, to inform the operator of its determination. This bill would require the enforcement agency to inform the operator that it is requiring the modification of the solid waste facility permit without a revision of the permit to allow the change if the enforcement agency determines that the proposed change meets specified requirements. By imposing new duties upon a local enforcement agency with regard to an application for a revised permit, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law requires a city, county, and city and county to incorporate the nondisposal facility element and any amendment to the element into the revised source reduction and recycling element at the time of the 5-year revision of the source reduction and recycling element. Existing law requires the board to review an amendment to a nondisposal facility element. Existing law requires a local task force to review and comment on amendments to a nondisposal facility element. This bill would repeal those requirements. The bill would instead require a city, county, city and county, or regional agency to update all information required to be included in the nondisposal facility element. The bill would provide that the update is not subject to approval by the board or comment and review by a local task force. (5) Existing law requires each state agency to submit an annual report to the board summarizing its progress in reducing solid waste that is due on September 1 of each year starting in 2010. This bill would change the due date to May 1 of each year. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2009 Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2009

How they voted

3529
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 70
Jun 2, 2009
D Democratic43
35 Yea 2 Nay 6
81% Yea
I Independent1
1 Nay
100% Nay
R Republican26
26 Nay
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
6
Aug 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 16, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 6).
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (35-29-6)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
May 6, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 23, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 22, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 13).
lower
Mar 12, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 25, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WC
Wesley Chesbro
DDemocratic
CA
2