AB 459 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Dissolution: disclosure.

Summary
Existing law requires each party to a proceeding for dissolution of marriage or legal separation of the parties to serve on the other party a preliminary declaration of disclosure of assets, as specified, and a final declaration of disclosure, as specified, unless service of the final disclosure is waived. Existing law requires each party to serve a preliminary declaration of disclosure after or concurrently with service of the petition for dissolution or nullity of marriage, or legal separation of the parties. If a party fails to serve a preliminary or final declaration of disclosure, as specified, or fails to provide information required in those declarations with sufficient particularity, if the other party has served the respective declaration of disclosure, and if the noncomplying party also fails to comply with a request for the preparation of the appropriate declaration of disclosure or further particularity, existing law authorizes the complying party to file a motion to compel a further response or for an order preventing the noncomplying party from presenting evidence on issues that should have been covered in the declaration of disclosure. Existing law generally prohibits entry of judgment with respect to the parties' property rights unless each party, or the attorney for that party, has executed and served a copy of the final declaration of disclosure and current income and expense declaration. Existing law requires a court to set aside a judgment when the parties have failed to comply with all disclosure requirements, as specified. This bill would add, as an additional option that a complying party may pursue if the noncomplying party fails to comply with the request described above, the option to file a motion showing good cause to grant the complying party's voluntary waiver of receipt of the noncomplying party's disclosure, as specified. If that motion is granted, the bill would require the court to set aside a judgment only at the request of the complying party, unless the motion is based on actual fraud or perjury, as specified. The bill would make related and conforming changes.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Apr 2009
Assembly Passage
Apr 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Signed into Law
Aug 2009
Introduced Feb 24, 2009 Signed Aug 6, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 22, 2009 · Assembly Jun 25, 2009

How they voted

390
Passed
Total votes 39
Jun 22, 2009
D Democratic25
25 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican14
14 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
3
Amendments
6
Aug 5, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 25, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-2)
assembly
Jun 25, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2263.)
lower
Jun 22, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0)
senate
Jun 22, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 15, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and to third reading.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 9).
upper
Apr 30, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (March 31).
lower
Mar 12, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 25, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BL
Bonnie Lowenthal
DDemocratic
CA
70