Elections: initiatives.
Summary
Existing law requires that the proponents of an initiative measure submit a draft of the measure to the Attorney General for preparation of a summary of its chief purposes and points. Under existing law, the proponents are required to also submit at that time a $200 fee that is held in trust and refunded to the proponents if the measure qualifies for the ballot within a specified time period, but the fee is paid to the General Fund if the measure fails to qualify. This bill would instead require that a new fee from $500 in 2010 to $2,000 in 2016 be paid in lieu of current fees. The bill would require the fee to be refunded if the measure qualifies for the ballot within 2 years and to be deposited into the General Fund if it does not qualify, to be used to reimburse the Attorney General for the costs of preparing the title and summary of proposed initiative measures. The bill would require in 2018 that the Attorney General biennially review the fee and increase it in accordance with an increase in the California Consumer Price Index.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 24, 2009
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Assembly May 28, 2009
How they voted
35–23
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 62
May 28, 2009
D
Democratic38
92% Yea
R
Republican24
95% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
4
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 10, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 49. Noes 29. Page 3292.)
lower
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 8, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 7).
upper
Jun 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., R., & C.A.
upper
May 28, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (35-23-4)
assembly
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (March 31).
lower
Mar 9, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Feb 25, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 436
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 436. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline