Seriously emotionally disturbed children: out-of-home placement.
Summary
Existing law requires payments, issued by county welfare departments, for 24-hour out-of-home care to be provided on behalf of any seriously emotionally disturbed child who has been placed out of home pursuant to an individualized education program (IEP) developed under a specified provision of existing law. Existing law restricts payments for this purpose to children placed in privately operated residential facilities licensed in accordance with the California Community Care Facilities Act. This bill, until January 1, 2013, would authorize these payments to be made to an out-of-state privately owned residential facility that meets applicable licensing requirements, and that is organized and operated on a for-profit basis, if specified conditions are met. The bill would require the State Department of Mental Health, in collaboration with the California Mental Health Directors Association, to provide prescribed information to the Legislature regarding the out-of-home placement of seriously emotionally disturbed children. This bill would also deem reimbursable specified costs of care for a seriously emotionally disturbed child with an individualized education program developed on or before the date the bill is enacted, that would otherwise satisfy the requirements of the bill. By increasing available placement options for seriously emotionally disturbed children, this bill would require additional duties of county welfare departments, and would thus impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2009
Last action Feb 2, 2010
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Amendments
3
May 28, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
lower
May 20, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 5, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 4, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 30, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 14).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 16, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and ED.
lower
Feb 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 421
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 421. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline