AB 384 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Property taxation: certificated aircraft assessment.

Summary
Existing property tax law requires the personal property of an air carrier be taxed at its fair market value, and the California Constitution requires property subject to ad valorem property taxation to be assessed in the county in which it is situated. Existing law, for the 2005–06 fiscal year to the 2010–11 fiscal year, inclusive, specifies a formula to determine the fair market value of certificated aircraft of a commercial air carrier. Existing law further requires, until December 31, 2010, the Aircraft Advisory Subcommittee of the California Assessors' Association to designate, after soliciting input from commercial air carriers operating in the state, a lead county assessor's office for each commercial air carrier operating certificated aircraft in this state in an assessment year, and requires the lead county assessor to calculate the value of the air carrier's personal property and to transmit these calculations to other county assessors, but specifies that each county assessor is responsible for assessing and enrolling the taxable value of the property in his or her county, as provided. Existing law also requires, until December 31, 2010, the lead county assessor's office to lead a team to audit the books and records of a commercial air carrier and authorizes these air carriers to file a property statement solely with the lead county assessor's office, as provided. This bill would extend the 2010–11 fiscal year termination date to the 2015–16 fiscal year and the December 31, 2010, repeal date to December 31, 2015, for the above-described provisions relating to the determination of the fair market value and taxation of certificated aircraft. This bill would also specify that it shall be rebuttably presumed that the fair market value of certificated aircraft is the amount determined under the formula specified above, and would authorize this value to be rebutted by certain evidence. This bill would also require the value of an individual aircraft assessed to the original owner of that aircraft to not exceed its original cost from the manufacturer, as provided. By extending the application of the aforementioned valuation process for certificated aircraft beyond the 2010–11 fiscal year, thereby imposing new duties upon a lead county assessor's office, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Jan 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 23, 2009 Signed Sep 24, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 12, 2010 · Assembly Jan 27, 2010

How they voted

320
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 37
Aug 12, 2010
D Democratic25
21 Yea 4
84% Yea
R Republican12
11 Yea 1
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
28
Key actions
11
Committee
12
Amendments
4
Sep 23, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6295.)
lower
Aug 12, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-5)
senate
Aug 12, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 17 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 9, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 3. Noes 0.) (June 9).
upper
May 5, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
upper
Feb 11, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
upper
Jan 27, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (54-7-7)
assembly
Jan 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (January 21).
lower
Jan 12, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (January 12).
lower
Jan 7, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (January 7).
lower
Jan 4, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RULES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jan 4, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Jan 4, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.
lower
May 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 22, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 9, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FM
Fiona Ma
DDemocratic
CA
12