Criminal procedure: narcotics and drug abuse cases.
Summary
Existing law provides that entry of judgment may be deferred with respect to defendants who are charged with certain enumerated crimes and meet certain criteria, including no prior convictions for any offense involving controlled substances and no prior felony convictions within the prior 5 years, as specified. Existing law requires the prosecuting attorney to review his or her file to determine whether those conditions apply to the defendant and, if the defendant is found ineligible for deferred entry of judgment, to file with a court a declaration stating the grounds upon which the determination is based. This bill would authorize the court, at the defendant's request, to review the prosecuting attorney's determination of ineligibility and would further authorize the court to make the final determination, as specified.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 23, 2009
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2009 · Assembly Jun 1, 2009
How they voted
21–18
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Aug 24, 2009
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican15
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
5
Committee
5
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 24, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-18-1)
senate
Jun 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-30-1)
assembly
May 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (May 12).
lower
Mar 9, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 358
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 358. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline