Transit village developments: infrastructure financing.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a city or county to create a transit village plan for a transit village development district. A transit village plan is required to include all land within not less than 14 mile of the exterior boundary of the parcel on which is located a transit station, as defined. A legislative body is authorized to create an infrastructure financing district, adopt an infrastructure financing plan, and issue bonds, for which only the district is liable, to finance specified public facilities, upon voter approval. This bill would recast the area included in a transit village plan to include all land within not more than 12 mile of the main entrance of a transit station. The requirement of voter approval for the formation of an infrastructure financing district, adoption of an infrastructure financing plan, and an issuance of bonds for the purpose of implementing a transit facility, as defined, would be eliminated. A transit village plan financed by these bonds would be required to include specified demonstrable public benefits regarding housing, replacement dwelling units at an affordable housing cost when specified dwelling units are destroyed or removed, and a provision that at least 20% of all revenues derived from the property tax increment be dedicated to increase, improve, and preserve the transit village district's supply of affordable housing, as defined. The bill also would make technical, nonsubstantive changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 65460.2 of the Government Code proposed by AB 1158, that would become operative only if AB 1158 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 18, 2009
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2009 · Assembly Jun 1, 2009
How they voted
20–14
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 36
Sep 3, 2009
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 10, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 48. Noes 29. Page 3256.)
lower
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-14-2)
senate
Jul 8, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 8).
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 25, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (35-26-1)
assembly
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 1).
lower
Mar 9, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 19, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FM
Fiona Ma
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 338
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 338. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline