Elections: voting devices.
Summary
Under existing law, an elections official is required, no later than 7 days prior to an election, to conduct a test or a series of tests to ensure that every device used to tabulate ballots accurately records each vote. Existing law also authorizes qualified political parties, a bona fide association of citizens, or a media organization to have not more than 2 representatives present to check and review the preparation and operation of the tabulating devices and the programming and testing of those devices at any or all phases of the election. This bill would require the county elections official to provide at least a 5-day public notice of the time and place of the test or series of tests of the tabulating devices and the preparation and operation of those devices and the programming and testing of those devices. The bill would also provide that the attendance of a representative at that time and place shall be subject to the existing restrictions. By requiring county elections officials to perform additional duties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 18, 2009
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2009 · Assembly May 26, 2009
How they voted
21–9
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 36
Aug 31, 2009
D
Democratic23
82% Yea
R
Republican13
69% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 2891.)
lower
Sep 1, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 31, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-9-6)
senate
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 8, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 7).
upper
Jun 16, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., R., & C.A.
upper
Jun 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., R., & C.A.
upper
May 26, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-0-4)
assembly
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 31).
lower
Mar 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Feb 19, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
0 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 330
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 330. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline