Less lethal weapons.
Summary
Existing law generally regulates dangerous weapons, including stun guns and tasers, and establishes offenses committed with stun guns and tasers. This bill would replace the term "taser" with "less lethal weapon" for these purposes. By expanding the scope of existing crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 626.10 of the Penal Code, proposed by AB 870, contingent on the prior enactment of that bill. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 18, 2009
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly Sep 9, 2009
How they voted
36–0
Passed
Total votes 36
Sep 4, 2009
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
4
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (59-0-2)
assembly
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 3175.)
lower
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 4, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0)
senate
Sep 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Jun 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 15, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 9, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 9).
upper
May 14, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 22).
lower
Apr 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 31).
lower
Mar 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 19, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JS
Jim Silva
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 322
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 322. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline