AB 300 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Subdivisions: water supply.

Summary
(1) The Subdivision Map Act prohibits approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, or a development agreement for a subdivision of property of more than 500 dwelling units, except as specified, including the design of the subdivision or the type of improvement, unless the legislative body of a city or county or the designated advisory agency provides written verification from the applicable public water system that a sufficient water supply is available or, in addition, a specified finding is made by the local agency that sufficient water supplies are, or will be, available prior to completion of the project. This bill would require, until January 1, 2017, the public water system, or the local agency if there is no public water system, to review, verify for accuracy, and approve, as specified, the subdivider's water savings projections attributable to voluntary demand management measures, as defined. The public water system would be authorized to collect fees necessary to provide the additional analysis of the voluntary demand management measures. This bill would provide that a water supply assessment completed, as specified, satisfies the existing requirement of verifying sufficient water supply, unless the public water system receives specified new information. The public water system would be required to determine the projected water savings attributable to the voluntary demand management measures that will be incorporated into the subdivision. The projected water savings would be required to be calculated using specified data compiled or maintained by the public water system or the water savings projections adopted by the California Urban Water Conservation Council. If a project applicant proposes to use a new voluntary water demand management measure for which neither the California Urban Water Conservation Council nor the public water system has adopted an estimate or method to calculate the projected water savings of the proposed voluntary demand management measure, the projected water savings would be required to be made based on documented methodologies or calculations submitted in the record. Five years after the project has been fully developed, the public water system would be required to include within its next urban water management plan a report on the monitoring and compliance of voluntary water demand management measures and to determine, if practicable based on readily available information, whether they have resulted in the water savings necessary to achieve the agreed upon water demand offsets. The bill would also require the public water system to document the measured annual water use of the subdivision in comparison to the projected demand associated with the subdivision, and to calculate the water savings attributable to the voluntary mitigation measures financed by the Voluntary Water Demand Mitigation Fund for the subdivision. If the public water system bases its written verification of a sufficient water supply for the subdivision, in whole or in part, on the use of voluntary demand management measures within the subdivision, the written verification would be required to be conditioned on the maintenance and operation of the voluntary demand management measures, or measures that are at least as water efficient, as agreed to by the applicant and the public water system, and the recordation as a covenant running with the land for the lots within the subdivision. The bill would provide that by acceptance of a deed to a lot, each purchaser would acknowledge the obligation to comply with the voluntary demand measures for the lot as described in the covenant. These covenants would be authorized to be enforced pursuant to the existing authority of a public water system. The bill would further require a builder, prior to the close of escrow, to give a purchaser information that would be required to be included in a maintenance manual that informs the purchaser of the existence of the home's unique water saving devices, including specified information. The bill would also encourage the public water system to commit to carrying out the water conservation measures funded by the Voluntary Water Demand Mitigation Fund within 24 months of the sale of the last unit of the proposed subdivision. The bill would require the public water system to choose water conservation measures that are the most cost-effective means to yield water savings. The bill would authorize expenditures from the fund to be made within the subdivision or elsewhere within the service area of the public water supplier, at its discretion. Not less than 40% of the proceeds from the voluntary water demand mitigation fund would be required to be directed to water conservation programs in any disadvantaged community, unless the public water system makes a specified finding. By adding to the duties of the public water system, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires a city or county that determines a project, as defined, is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act to identify any public water system that may supply water for the project and to request those public water systems to prepare a specified water supply assessment. If no public water system is identified, the city or county is required to prepare the water supply assessment. This bill would require, until January 1, 2017, if the project applicant elects to include voluntary demand management measures, any city, county, or public water system preparing a water supply assessment to reduce the projected water demand for the project to an amount below planned water demand reduction actions contained in an adopted urban water management plan and the current statutory, regulatory, and local ordinance requirements, based on the project applicant's voluntary water demand management measures, as defined. The bill would authorize the applicant to enter into a mutual agreement with the public water system to mitigate water demand associated with a proposed subdivision by depositing funds in a Voluntary Water Demand Mitigation Fund, as defined. The fees paid into the Voluntary Water Demand Mitigation Fund would be prohibited from exceeding the amount necessary to offset the actual or percentage of actual water demand impacts agreed upon in the agreement between the applicant and the public water system. The bill would authorize, at the discretion of the public water system, the amount required for the Voluntary Water Demand Mitigation Fund to be reduced by a portion of the normally required system capacity charges that finance future water supplies. The bill would also authorize any reduction in the capacity charge to be calculated using the amount of water projected to be conserved using the Voluntary Water Demand Mitigation Fund at the cost determined by the public water system for developing new water supplies or for water conservation. The bill would not require the total reduction in system capacity charges to be equal to the amount paid into the Voluntary Water Demand Mitigation Fund. The bill would require the public water system to determine the projected water savings attributable to the voluntary demand management measures that will be incorporated into the project. The public water system would be required to expend all funds from the Voluntary Water Demand Mitigation Fund on water conservation measures that will reduce the projected demand associated with the subdivision. The public water system would be prohibited from using any funds from the Voluntary Water Conservation Mitigation Fund to supplant funding for water conservation programs required by planned water reduction actions contained in an adopted urban water management plan, existing law, or paid for by existing customers through water rates and surcharges. By adding to the duties of the public water system, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2009 Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly May 28, 2009

How they voted

630
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 70
May 28, 2009
D Democratic43
36 Yea 7
83% Yea
I Independent1
1 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican26
26 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
7
Jul 7, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set.
upper
Jun 30, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Jun 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Jun 22, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on N.R. & W. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 17).
upper
Jun 10, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Jun 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and N.R. & W.
upper
May 28, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-7)
assembly
May 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 20).
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
lower
Apr 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 15).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and W.,P. & W.
lower
Feb 18, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

No sponsor information available.