Redevelopment: pooled housing funds: emergency shelters and transitional housing.
Summary
The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes the establishment of redevelopment agencies in communities in order to address the effects of blight, as defined, in those communities and requires those agencies to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and approve a redevelopment plan for each area. Existing law also requires that not less than 20% of the tax-increment revenue allocated to a redevelopment agency be used to increase, improve, and preserve the supply of the community's low- and moderate-income housing within the territorial jurisdiction of the agency, and for this purpose, the funds are held in a separate Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. This bill would redefine the term redevelopment to include improving, increasing, or preserving emergency shelters for homeless persons or households. The bill would authorize donor agencies, as defined, located within the same housing region to create and participate in a joint powers authority and to enter into an interagency agreement for the purpose of pooling a permitted portion of housing funds for emergency shelters for homeless persons or households and transitional housing units. The bill would authorize the agencies to transfer a portion of their housing funds to a joint powers authority or to a receiving agency, as defined, for use by the authority or agency pursuant to these provisions. The bill would require that the emergency shelters assisted with low- and moderate-income housing funds remain available at affordable housing cost to specified persons, families, and households for not less than 55 years, provided that a certain requirement is met.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly May 4, 2009
How they voted
61–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 62
May 4, 2009
D
Democratic38
97% Yea
R
Republican24
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Jun 14, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 27, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 19, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 18, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 20, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (May 20).
upper
May 14, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
May 14, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
May 4, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0-1)
assembly
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 22).
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 1).
lower
Mar 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BN
Brian Nestande
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 288
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 288. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline