Los Angeles Community College District: design-assist contract pilot program.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes a community college district governing board to enter into a design-build contract, as defined, until January 1, 2014, in which factors in addition to price and cost may be considered in awarding a contract for the design and construction of a community college facility for an amount that exceeds $2,500,000. This bill would establish a design-assist contract pilot program that would authorize the Los Angeles Community College District governing board to enter into a design-assist contract, as defined, for a project with an estimated cost exceeding $2,500,000. The bill would prohibit expenditure of state funds appropriated for a design-assist capital outlay project until the Department of Finance and State Public Works Board have approved performance criteria and concept drawings. The bill would impose various requirements on the governing board related to the design-assist construction process and would prohibit the governing board from entering into more than 8 design-assist contracts under these provisions before January 1, 2017. If the governing board elects to award a design-assist contract for a construction project, the bill would require the governing board to submit a report to the Legislative Analyst's Office in compliance with a specific provision of existing law, and would require the Legislative Analyst's Office to submit an interim report to the Legislature by January 1, 2013, and a final report by January 1, 2016. The bill would require design-assist entities to verify certain information under oath, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program by expanding the scope of an existing crime. The provisions of the bill would be repealed on January 1, 2017. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
3
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Apr 20, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 12, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 12).
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RULES by unanimous consent.
lower
Apr 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 18, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WT
Warren T Furutani
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2753
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2753. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline