Regulations: agency statement of reasons.
Summary
Existing law, the Administrative Procedure Act, governs the procedure for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of regulations by state agencies and for the review of those regulatory actions by the Office of Administrative Law. Existing law requires an agency to submit to the office, among other things, an initial statement of reasons for proposing the adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation that includes, among other things, a description of reasonable alternatives to the regulation. Existing law requires, for a regulation that would mandate the use of specific technologies or equipment or prescribe specific actions or procedures, that the imposition of performance standards be considered as an alternative and that the initial statement of reasons include a statement of reasons why the agency believes that mandates or prescriptive standards are required. This bill would, from January 1, 2012, until January 1, 2014, recast these provisions and require that the initial statement of reasons also include a description of any performance standard that was considered as an alternative to the proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of the regulation. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Signed Sep 27, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 25, 2010 · Assembly May 13, 2010
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 25, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
7
Sep 25, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2010
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 74. Noes 1. Page 6784.)
lower
Aug 25, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-4)
senate
Aug 25, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 17, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Aug 10, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 9).
upper
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 28, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 22).
upper
Jun 3, 2010
Committee
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and RLS.
upper
May 13, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (55-0-6)
assembly
May 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 5).
lower
Apr 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (April 20).
lower
Mar 18, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Roger Niello
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2738
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2738. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline