Vehicles: automated traffic enforcement system: City and County of San Francisco.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a local authority to place an official traffic control device at an intersection to regulate or prohibit turning movements at that intersection and requires that when a right- or left-hand turn is prohibited at an intersection that notice be given by erection of a sign. Existing law authorizes the limit line, intersection, or other places where a driver is required to stop to be equipped with an automated traffic enforcement system to enforce specified violations, including turning in violation of an official traffic control device, if the system meets certain requirements. Existing law authorizes a governmental agency to contract out the operation of the system under certain circumstances, except for specified activities. This bill would authorize the City and County of San Francisco to utilize an automated traffic enforcement system to enforce a specified traffic offense involving prohibited turning movements from Market Street onto the Central Freeway located at the intersection of Market Street and Octavia Boulevard if the system meets the above-stated requirements. The bill would require the City and County of San Francisco to compile prescribed data, and report to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Housing and the Assembly Committee on Transportation on specified topics related to the safety and traffic flow impacts that may have resulted if the above provisions are implemented. This bill would state the findings and declarations of the Legislature concerning the need for special legislation, and would require that these provisions remain in effect only until January 1, 2013.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
May 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Vetoed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2010 · Assembly May 6, 2010
How they voted
21–14
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 38
Aug 24, 2010
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
7
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 25, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 49. Noes 24. Page 6688.)
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-14-3)
senate
Aug 24, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 29).
upper
May 20, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 6, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-22-6)
assembly
Apr 26, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 22, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (April 19).
lower
Apr 12, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 25, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 25, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2729
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2729. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline