Recycling: beverage containers: recycling centers.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act (act) , requires a distributor to pay a redemption payment for every beverage container sold or offered for sale in the state to the Division of Recycling in the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. The division is required to deposit those amounts in the California Beverage Container Recycling Fund. Existing law defines "convenience zone" for the purposes of the act and requires that every convenience zone is to be served by at least one certified recycling center, with specified operating hours. Existing law imposes specified requirements upon dealers located in a convenience zone that is not served by a recycling center, including that the dealer redeem beverage containers at the dealer's location when the dealer is open for business. This bill would define the term "unserved convenience zone" and would make a dealer who is located in an unserved convenience zone and meets certain requirements eligible for the payment of handling fees, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would permit the division to authorize an operator of a certified recycling center to be open for business less than 30 hours per week, but not less than 20 hours per week, if the recycling center is located in an unserved convenience zone, as defined, that has been unserved for at least 6 continuous months. (2) Under existing law, the money in the fund is continuously appropriated to the division to pay, among other things, handling fees to provide an incentive for the redemption of empty beverage containers in convenience zones. Existing law prohibits the division from making handling fee payments to more than one certified recycling center in a convenience zone. This bill would make additional certified recycling centers eligible for handling fees, thereby making an appropriation.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2010
How they voted
60–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 61
Jun 1, 2010
D
Democratic37
97% Yea
R
Republican24
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
3
Aug 12, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.
upper
Jun 29, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 1, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-0-1)
assembly
May 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 28, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 15, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 12).
lower
Apr 6, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 18, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
AA
Anthony Adams
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2718
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2718. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline