Civil rights: homeless persons.
Summary
Existing law sets forth various personal rights and provides that all persons within California have the right to be free from violence, or intimidation by the threat of violence, because of, among other characteristics, their race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, political affiliation, or sex. Existing law further permits an individual whose exercise or enjoyment of specified personal rights has been interfered with to bring a civil action for damages, including actual damages, exemplary damages, attorney's fees, injunctive relief, and other appropriate relief. Existing law requires the Department of Fair Employment and Housing to receive, investigate, and conciliate complaints that an individual's personal rights have been violated. This bill would specify that homeless persons, as defined, are entitled to the rights set forth under existing law, and would provide that a homeless person has the right to be free from violence or intimidation by threat of violence directed against that person on the basis of that person's status as a homeless person. The bill would also provide that these provisions shall not be construed to enlarge or diminish an existing duty, if any, by an owner of residential rental or commercial property to protect a homeless person who is present on the property from violence or intimidation by threats of violence. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 51.7 of the Civil Code, proposed by AB 1680, contingent upon the prior enactment of that bill.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Vetoed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2010 · Assembly May 6, 2010
How they voted
21–12
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 38
Aug 23, 2010
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
6
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 51. Noes 26. Page 6595.)
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-12-5)
senate
Aug 23, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 3, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (August 2).
upper
Jun 23, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
upper
Jun 22, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jun 21, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 15).
upper
May 20, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 6, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-22-7)
assembly
Apr 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 21, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 20, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 19, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 18, 2010
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2706
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2706. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline