Developmental services: planning teams.
Summary
Existing law, the California Early Intervention Services Act, provides a statewide system of coordinated, comprehensive, family-centered, multidisciplinary, and interagency programs that are responsible for providing appropriate early intervention services and support to all eligible infants and toddlers, as defined, and their families and requires an eligible infant or toddler receiving services under the act to have an individualized family service plan (IFSP) . Under existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, the State Department of Developmental Services is responsible for providing various services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities, and for ensuring the appropriateness and quality of those services and supports. Under existing law, the department contracts with regional centers to provide services and supports to persons with developmental disabilities. The services and supports to be provided to a regional center consumer are contained in an individual program plan (IPP) , developed in accordance with prescribed requirements. Under existing law, development and monitoring of IFSPs and IPPs is done by planning teams, as defined, that include specified participants. Existing law requires the final decision regarding a consumer's IPP or IFSP to be made pursuant to the relevant statute. This bill would, instead, require a regional center to ensure, at the time of the development, scheduled review, or modification of an IFSP or IPP, that all decisions pertaining to the purchase and provision of services to that consumer are made pursuant to the relevant statutes.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly May 13, 2010
How they voted
61–5
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 73
May 13, 2010
D
Democratic46
95% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
61% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Aug 12, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 5, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.
upper
Jul 8, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 23, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 22).
upper
May 27, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 13, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-5-7)
assembly
May 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 5).
lower
Apr 21, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 20, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 19, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 6, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 18, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WC
Wesley Chesbro
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2702
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2702. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline