Arson: aggravated: punishment.
Summary
Existing law defines the crime of aggravated arson, and makes a person guilty of that crime if the fire caused property damage and other losses in excess of $5,650,000. Existing law specifies costs to be included in calculating property damage for purposes of these provisions and states legislative intent to review the property damage threshold in light of inflation within 5 years. Existing law repeals the provisions relating to property damage on January 1, 2010. This bill would increase the amount of damage required for a person to be guilty of aggravated arson from $5,650,000 to $6,500,000 and extend the repeal date for the provisions relating to property damage until January 1, 2014. By extending the operative effect of an existing crime, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2008
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Jul 2009
Signed into Law
Aug 2009
Introduced Dec 1, 2008
Signed Aug 6, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jul 9, 2009 · Assembly Jun 1, 2009
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 36
Jul 9, 2009
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Aug 5, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 9, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-5)
senate
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0-1)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 1, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 17, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 17).
lower
Feb 5, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Dec 2, 2008
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 1.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
KD
Kevin D Jeffries
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 27
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 27. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline