AB 2698 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Foster youth: identity theft.

Summary
Under existing law, a county welfare department is required to request a consumer disclosure, pursuant to federal law, on behalf of a youth in a foster care placement in the county, when the youth reaches his or her 16th birthday, in order to ascertain whether the youth has been the victim of identity theft. If the consumer disclosure reveals any negative items, or evidence that identity theft has occurred, existing law requires the county welfare department to refer the youth to an approved organization that provides services to victims of identity theft. Existing law requires the department to develop a list of approved organizations for this purpose, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association and others. This bill would revise the above provisions to require the county welfare department or the State Department of Social Services to ascertain whether identity theft may have occurred under the described circumstances. The bill would permit the matter to be referred to a governmental agency or nonprofit organization that provides information and assistance to victims of identity theft, rather than to an approved counseling organization. The bill would authorize the agency or the nonprofit organization to take remedial actions to clear the youth's credit record and to report the results to the county welfare department. The bill would require the Office of Privacy Protection, in consultation with the State Department of Social Services and other specified entities, to develop a list of governmental agencies and nonprofit organizations to which the matter may be referred for assistance in responding to an instance of suspected identity theft.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010 Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2010 · Assembly May 20, 2010

How they voted

34–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 37
Aug 19, 2010
D Democratic25
23 Yea 2
92% Yea
R Republican12
11 Yea 1
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
26
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6480.)
lower
Aug 19, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-3)
senate
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 21 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 3, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 2).
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 23, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 22).
upper
Jun 3, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 20, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-6)
assembly
May 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 12).
lower
Apr 20, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Mar 18, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Marty Block
Marty Block
DDemocratic
CA
39