State contracts: participation goals.
Summary
Existing law establishes participation goals for certain state contracts with minority business enterprises, women business enterprises, and disabled veteran business enterprises. These provisions, with respect to minority and women business enterprises, were held unconstitutional on the basis of not meeting equal protection requirements. The bill would also revise the requirements imposed on disabled veteran business enterprises to, among other changes, require a disabled veteran to have at least a 10% service-connected disability and require a disabled veteran business enterprise to submit specified income tax information to the Office of Small Business and Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Services. Existing law further requires an awarding state department for contracts for materials, supplies, or equipment to accept the submission by a bidder of a minority, women, or disabled veteran business enterprise utilization plan that has been approved prior to the solicitation due date by the Department of General Services in accordance with certain criteria. This bill would revise the minimum criteria for a business utilization plan to be approved by the Department of General Services, as specified. The bill would also expand the types of contracts to which these provisions apply to include contracts for commodities, property, goods, professional services, construction work, or equipment, including information technology goods and services.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly May 13, 2010
How they voted
70–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 73
May 13, 2010
D
Democratic46
95% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Aug 12, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 9, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 1, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 22).
upper
Jun 17, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on V.A.
upper
May 27, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on V.A.
upper
May 13, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-3)
assembly
May 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 5).
lower
Apr 20, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 20).
lower
Apr 12, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on J.,E.D., & E.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on J.,E.D., & E. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on J.,E.D., & E.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Nielsen
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2627
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2627. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline