Elections: vote by mail ballots.
Summary
Existing law requires an elections official to count only those vote by mail ballots returned by mail that are received by the elections official or delivered to a polling place by the close of the polls on the day of the election that contain specified information. Existing law also requires the elections official to establish procedures to ensure the secrecy of any vote by mail ballot returned to a precinct polling place. Existing law also requires procedures to track and confirm the receipt of voted vote by mail ballots and requires that this information be available by means of online access using the county's elections division Internet Web site. Existing law requires the elections official to establish procedures to ensure the security, confidentiality, and integrity of any personal information collected, stored, or otherwise used in tracking vote by mail ballots. This bill would require county elections officials to permit a vote by mail voter to find out whether his or her vote had been counted, and if not, the reason why, via online access on the county's Internet Web site or via a toll-free telephone number. Because this bill would impose new duties on local elections officials, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Vetoed Sep 23, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2010 · Assembly May 6, 2010
How they voted
22–8
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 38
Aug 24, 2010
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican13
61% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Sep 23, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 25, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 75. Noes 1. Page 6663.)
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-8-8)
senate
Aug 24, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 15).
upper
May 20, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., R., & C.A.
upper
May 6, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0-4)
assembly
Apr 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 20).
lower
Apr 13, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Apr 12, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 18, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2616
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2616. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline