State property: sales.
Summary
(1) Existing law, enacted in 2009, authorized the sale or lease of specified real property or buildings, or both, in Los Angeles, Oakland, Rancho Cordova, Sacramento, San Francisco, and Santa Rosa. Existing law authorizes the Director of General Services to determine the terms and conditions that are to be imposed upon that sale or lease, for the best interests of the state. This bill would require the Director of General Services, at least 30 days prior to executing a transaction for a sale or lease as described above, to submit to the chairs of the fiscal committees of the Legislature an analysis of the transaction comparing the costs and benefits to the state of a sale or lease of the real property or building to continued ownership over a 50-year period. The bill would prohibit the real property or buildings from being sold or leased until the Legislature determines that the transaction is in the best interests of the state, makes a finding to this effect, and explicitly authorizes the sale by statute. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 3, 2010
How they voted
63–0
Passed · 10 other
Total votes 73
Jun 3, 2010
D
Democratic46
97% Yea
I
Independent1
0% Nay
R
Republican26
69% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
6
Aug 12, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.
upper
Jun 28, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 22, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 22).
upper
Jun 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Jun 3, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-10)
assembly
Jun 1, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Jun 1, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
May 12, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 28, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 27, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 26, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 19).
lower
Apr 19, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
lower
Mar 25, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2605
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2605. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline