Banking development districts.
Summary
Existing law provides for various programs and activities in the development of economic opportunities for businesses in the state. The California Small Business Financial Development Corporation Law establishes small business financial development corporations and provides for their regulation by the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency. Existing law, the Banking Law, provides for the regulation of banks by the Department of Financial Institutions. This bill would create a Banking Development District Program, within the department, that would encourage the establishment of banking branches in designated geographic locations where there is an underserved community, as defined. The bill would require the department to provide information on the Banking Development District Program to the Treasurer and would authorize the Treasurer to utilize the Banking Development District Program when promoting the Treasurer's Time Deposit Program. The bill would require the department to adopt rules and regulations for the establishment and maintenance of banking development districts and to evaluate and approve applications for designation of banking development districts. The bill would require the department to develop and provide certain incentives to banks, as defined, located in a banking development district. The bill would also require the department to establish and post on its Internet Web site a performance review process for the program, as specified.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2010 · Assembly Jun 2, 2010
How they voted
23–11
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 37
Aug 19, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
9
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 51. Noes 25. Page 6530.)
lower
Aug 19, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-11-3)
senate
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 21 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 17, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 16, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (August 12).
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (June 30).
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., F. & I.
upper
Jun 2, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-26-3)
assembly
May 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 28, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
May 12, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 27, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 26, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 22, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (April 19).
lower
Mar 18, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Bradford
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2581
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2581. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline