Local government: Williamson Act: contracts.
Summary
Existing law, the Williamson Act, authorizes a city or county to enter into 10-year contracts with owners of land devoted to agricultural use, whereby the owners agree to continue using the property for that purpose, and the city or county agrees to value the land accordingly for purposes of property taxation. Existing law sets forth procedures for reimbursing cities and counties for property tax revenues not received as a result of these contracts. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2011, and until January 1, 2015, authorize a county, in any fiscal year in which payments authorized for reimbursement to a county for lost revenue are less than 12 of the participating county's actual foregone general fund property tax revenue, to revise the term for new contracts and require the assessor to value the property, as specified, based on the new contract. The bill would provide that a landowner may choose to nonrenew and begin the cancellation process. The bill would also provide that any increased revenues generated by properties under a new contract shall be paid to the county.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Signed Sep 27, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2010 · Assembly Aug 31, 2010
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 30, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
41
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Amendments
3
Sep 25, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-0)
assembly
Aug 31, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6915.)
lower
Aug 30, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 30).
lower
Aug 30, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 30, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 25, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Return to Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.)
upper
Aug 20, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Aug 20, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Jun 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (June 16).
upper
May 20, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Apr 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 28).
lower
Apr 12, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 25, 2010
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Nielsen
RRepublican
Co
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Co
MY
Mariko Yamada
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2530
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2530. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline