AB 252 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Practice of medicine: cosmetic surgery: employment of physicians and surgeons.

Summary
Existing law, the Medical Practice Act, establishes the Medical Board of California under the Department of Consumer Affairs, which licenses physicians and surgeons and regulates their practice. The Medical Practice Act restricts the employment of licensed physicians and surgeons and podiatrists by a corporation or other artificial legal entity, subject to specified exemptions. Existing law makes it unlawful to knowingly make, or cause to be made, any false or fraudulent claim for payment of a health care benefit, or to aid, abet, solicit, or conspire with any person to do so, and makes a violation of this prohibition a public offense. This bill would authorize the revocation of the license of a physician and surgeon who practices medicine with, or serves or is employed as the medical director of, a business organization that provides outpatient elective cosmetic medical procedures or treatments, as defined, knowing that the organization is owned or operated in violation of the prohibition against employment of licensed physicians and surgeons and podiatrists. The bill would also make a business organization that provides outpatient elective cosmetic medical procedures or treatments, that is owned and operated in violation of the prohibition, and that contracts with or employs a physician and surgeon to facilitate the offer or provision of those procedures or treatments that may only be provided by a licensed physician and surgeon, guilty of a violation of the prohibition against knowingly making or causing to be made any false or fraudulent claim for payment of a health care benefit. Because the bill would expand a public offense, it would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would state that its provisions are declaratory of existing law. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Jul 2009
Vetoed
Aug 2009
Introduced Feb 11, 2009 Vetoed Aug 17, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jul 16, 2009 · Assembly May 4, 2009

How they voted

34–1
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 39
Jul 16, 2009
D Democratic25
22 Yea 3
88% Yea
R Republican14
12 Yea 1 Nay 1
85% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Aug 17, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Aug 5, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Jul 16, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-1-4)
senate
Jun 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 8, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 8).
upper
May 14, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
May 4, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-1)
assembly
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 22).
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (March 31).
lower
Mar 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 12, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 14.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors