Warrants: electronic signature: computer server transmission.
Summary
Existing law establishes various grounds for the issuance of a search warrant. Existing law requires a search warrant to be issued upon probable cause, supported by affidavit, naming or describing the person to be searched or searched for, and particularly describing the property, thing, or things and the place to be searched. Under existing law, a magistrate may examine a person seeking a warrant under oath and is required to take a signed affidavit or affidavits. Under existing law, an oath may be made to a magistrate using a telephone and facsimile transmission equipment or by using a telephone and electronic mail and the affiant may sign the affidavit using a digital signature. Existing law requires the magistrate to cause the warrant, supporting affidavit, and attachments to be printed if received by electronic mail, and to return them to the court to be open to the public once the warrant is executed and returned. Existing law also provides that a magistrate may authorize a "duplicate original" for a remote affiant which, after its execution, is also required to be returned. This bill would allow an oath to be made using, in addition, a telephone and computer server, and would allow the affiant's signature to be in the form of an electronic signature. This bill would delete the requirement that the magistrate cause the warrant, supporting affidavit, and attachments to be printed if received by electronic mail or computer server, and would, in cases with fax, electronic mail, or server affidavits, delete the requirement that the magistrate return the printed documents to the court, leaving only the "duplicate original" to be returned by the remote affiant. This bill would allow the magistrate to sign the warrant using a digital signature or electronic signature if electronic mail or computer server is used.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Apr 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Signed into Law
Jul 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Signed Jul 15, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 28, 2010 · Assembly Apr 29, 2010
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 38
Jun 28, 2010
D
Democratic25
76% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
6
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Jul 15, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 28, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-7)
senate
Jun 15, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 15).
upper
May 13, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 29, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-3)
assembly
Apr 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 20).
lower
Apr 12, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
AS
Audra Strickland
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2505
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2505. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline