Judges: disqualification.
Summary
Existing law sets forth the grounds for disqualification of a judge, including, but not limited to, if the judge has a financial interest in the subject matter in a proceeding or in a party to the proceeding. This bill would provide for the disqualification of a judge who has received a contribution in excess of $1,500 from a party or lawyer in the proceeding, and either the contribution was received in support of the judge's last election, if the last election was within the last 6 years, or the contribution was received in anticipation of an upcoming election. The bill would further disqualify a judge based on a contribution of a lesser amount under specified circumstances. The bill would require the judge to disclose any contribution from a party or lawyer in a matter that is before the court that is required to be reported, as specified, even if the amount would not require disqualification under these provisions. The bill would permit the party that did not make the contribution to waive this disqualification, except as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
May 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Signed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 9, 2010 · Assembly May 6, 2010
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 38
Aug 9, 2010
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
8
Sep 30, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 12, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6160.)
lower
Aug 9, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-4)
senate
Aug 9, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
May 20, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 6, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0-8)
assembly
May 4, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 3, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 21, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 20, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 12, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
MF
Mike Feuer
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2487
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2487. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline