Courts: civil actions.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the governing association of a common interest development and the builder of the development to comply with specified dispute resolution procedures. However, existing law, until July 1, 2010, provides that if the parties have not settled the matter, the association or its assignee may file a complaint in superior court, as provided. This bill would extend the operation of these latter provisions to July 1, 2017. (2) Existing law specifies various uniform fees for filing specified documents in connection with certain civil proceedings. The fee for filing in the superior court an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice is $250. This bill would increase the fee for filing in the superior court an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice to $500. This bill would provide for $250 of the fee to be deposited into the Immediate and Critical Needs Account of the State Court Facilities Construction Fund and for $250 of the fee to be deposited into the Trial Court Trust Fund.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Vetoed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 26, 2010 · Assembly May 24, 2010
How they voted
20–11
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 26, 2010
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 6878.)
lower
Aug 30, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 26, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-11-4)
senate
Jun 30, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 21, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 3, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 24, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (32-22-7)
assembly
May 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 19).
lower
May 17, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 13, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
May 4, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 20, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 11, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
MF
Mike Feuer
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2485
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2485. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline