School districts: interdistrict attendance.
Summary
Existing law requires each person between the ages of 6 and 18 years, inclusive, who is not otherwise exempt, to attend the public full-time day school in the school district in which his or her parent or guardian is a resident. Existing law authorizes the governing boards of 2 or more school districts to enter into an agreement, for a term not to exceed 5 school years, for the interdistrict attendance of pupils who are residents of the districts. Existing law requires the supervisor of attendance of the district of residence to issue an individual permit verifying the district's approval, pursuant to policies of the board and terms of the agreement, for the transfer and for the applicable period of time. Existing law establishes an appeal process for pupils whose permits are denied, or, in the absence of an agreement between the districts, if the districts fail or refuse to enter into an agreement. This bill would preclude a pupil who is enrolled in a school pursuant to these provisions from having to reapply for an interdistrict transfer, and would require the governing board of the school district of enrollment to allow the pupil to continue to attend the school in which he or she is enrolled, except if the district of residence and district of enrollment agree otherwise. The bill would provide an exception for this agreement authority for pupils entering grade 11 or 12 in the subsequent school year.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Signed Sep 24, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2010 · Assembly May 13, 2010
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 38
Aug 23, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
5
Sep 23, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6587.)
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-3)
senate
Aug 23, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 23).
upper
May 27, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 13, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-3)
assembly
May 11, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 10, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 5).
lower
Apr 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 11, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WT
Warren T Furutani
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2444
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2444. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline