Indian children.
Summary
The federal Indian Child Welfare Act governs the proceedings for determining the placement of an Indian child when that child is removed from the custody of his or her parent or guardian. Existing provisions of state law govern child custody proceedings, adoption proceedings, dependency proceedings, including termination of parental rights, the voluntary relinquishment of a child by a parent, and guardianship proceedings. Existing law recognizes that the Indian Child Welfare Act applies if the subject of these proceedings is or may be an Indian child and specifies conforming procedures in these cases with regard to the right to notice and intervention accorded the child's tribe and the standard of proof applied in evaluating the evidence submitted, among other things. Existing law provides various definitions for these purposes. This bill would revise the definition of "Indian child" for purposes of Indian child custody proceedings to include an unmarried person who is 18 years of age or over but under 21 years of age, and who is either a member of an Indian tribe or eligible for membership in an Indian tribe, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 11, 2010 · Assembly May 6, 2010
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 38
Aug 11, 2010
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
6
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 12, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6146.)
lower
Aug 11, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-5)
senate
Aug 11, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 13 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 10, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 0.) (June 10).
upper
Jun 1, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 20, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 6, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-4)
assembly
Apr 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 28, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 27, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 22, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 21, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 12, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and HUM. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
PJ
Paul J Cook
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2418
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2418. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline