Child custody: parent on active military duty.
Summary
Existing law provides that a party's absence, relocation, or failure to comply with custody and visitation orders is not, by itself, sufficient to justify a modification of a custody or visitation order if the reason for the absence, relocation, or failure is the party's activation to military service and deployment out of state. This bill would apply this provision to cases in which a party's absence, relocation, or failure to comply is due to the party's activation to military service, mobilization in support of combat or other military operation, or military deployment out of state, as defined. The bill would authorize the court to issue a temporary order for custody and visitation for the period in which the party will be deployed, mobilized, or on temporary duty, as specified, and would establish a presumption that, upon the return of that party, the order shall revert back to the custody order that was in place prior to the modification. The bill would further authorize the court to grant reasonable visitation rights to a stepparent, grandparent, or other family member if the court finds a preexisting relationship, as specified, that the visitation would facilitate the child's contact with the party who is deployed, mobilized, or on temporary duty, and the court balances the interest of the child in having visitation with the family member against the right of the parents to exercise parental authority. The bill would require the court to order an expedited hearing or allow the party who is deployed, mobilized, or on temporary duty to present evidence and participate in court-ordered custody mediation by electronic means under specified circumstances.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Apr 2010
Assembly Passage
Apr 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 11, 2010 · Assembly Aug 12, 2010
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 37
Aug 11, 2010
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
5
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 12, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-1)
assembly
Aug 12, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6144.)
lower
Aug 11, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-4)
senate
Aug 11, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 13 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jun 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 10).
upper
Apr 29, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 6).
lower
Mar 24, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 23, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 11, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
PJ
Paul J Cook
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2416
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2416. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline