Pet insurance.
Summary
Existing law provides for the regulation of various types of insurance by the Department of Insurance. This bill would provide for the regulation of pet insurance, as defined. The bill would, in connection with the sale of a new, amended, or renewed pet insurance policy on or after July 1, 2011, require pet insurers to reasonably disclose to the consumer (1) if the policy excludes coverage on the basis of a preexisting condition or other disorder, as specified, (2) any policy provision that limits coverage in a specified manner, and (3) whether the insurer reduces coverage or increases premiums based on claims experience in any preceding policy period. The bill would also, with respect to pet insurance policies marketed, issued, amended, renewed, or delivered on or after July 1, 2011, require pet insurers that determine claim payments on any basis or that use a benefit schedule to clearly disclose that basis or schedule in the policy and through a link on the insurer's Internet Web site, as specified. The bill would enact other related provisions. The bill would require the department to post on its Internet Web site a list of the insurers that offer, issue, or underwrite pet insurance in the state; the names of the products that those insurers offer, issue, or underwrite; the names of their general agents with authority to offer, issue, or underwrite pet insurance; and a link to insurers' company profiles maintained by the department.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Vetoed Sep 23, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2010 · Assembly Jun 1, 2010
How they voted
26–9
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 38
Aug 23, 2010
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican13
61% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Sep 23, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 49. Noes 26. Page 6586.)
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-9-3)
senate
Aug 23, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 3, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (August 2).
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 1, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (June 30).
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., F. & I.
upper
Jun 1, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-21-4)
assembly
May 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
May 5, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 19, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 15, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 7).
lower
Mar 11, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
0 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2411
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2411. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline