Child abuse: crime scenes: hallucinogens, methamphetamine, cocaine, PCP, and heroin.
Summary
Existing law encourages every law enforcement and social services agency in this state to develop, adopt, and implement written policies and standards for their response to narcotics crime scenes where a child is either immediately present or where there is evidence that a child lives. Existing law provides that these policies shall reflect the fact that exposing a child to the manufacturing, trafficking, and use of narcotics is criminal conduct and that a response coordinated by law enforcement and social services agencies is essential to the child's health and welfare. This bill would make these provisions applicable also to crime scenes involving hallucinogens, methamphetamine, cocaine, PCP, and heroin. The bill would delete obsolete language. Existing law further provides that the needs of a drug-endangered child are best served with written policies encouraging the arrest of an individual for child endangerment where there is probable cause that an offense has been committed coordinated with an appropriate investigation of the child's welfare by child protective agencies, and that protocols that encourage a dependency investigation contemporaneous with a law enforcement investigation at a narcotics crime scene, when appropriate, are consistent with a child's best interest. This bill would provide that protocols that encourage the removal of a child from a crime scene if an immediate threat to the child's health or safety exists, when appropriate, are also consistent with the child's best interest. This bill would provide that protocols, policies, and standards adopted or developed pursuant to the above provisions shall comply with and be consistent with existing provisions of law relating to the jurisdiction over, and temporary custody and detention of, dependent children.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Apr 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Vetoed Sep 25, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 9, 2010 · Assembly Apr 26, 2010
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 34
Aug 9, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
4
Amendments
6
Sep 25, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 12, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6160.)
lower
Aug 9, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-3)
senate
Aug 9, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
May 6, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 26, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-0-4)
assembly
Apr 20, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 19, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 11, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2410
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2410. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline