Conveyances: DeLaveaga Park.
Summary
Existing law requires all real property within the DeLaveaga Park Property owned by the state, other than that portion leased to the City of Santa Cruz, to be used for a National Guard camp of instruction and, if that use is determined by the Adjutant General to be no longer necessary for that purpose, requires the Department of General Services to reconvey the real property to the city, to be used in perpetuity for public recreational purposes. The department is also directed to convey to the city its fee interest in that portion of the DeLaveaga Park Property leased to the city to be used as a municipally owned public golf course, if the city simultaneously conveys in fee to the state the portion of the property that is leased to the state. This bill would describe the portion of real property within the DeLaveaga Park Property owned by the state and comprised of approximately 40 acres to be referred to as "the armory site," and make various conforming changes. The bill would delete the provisions requiring the Department of General Services to reconvey the real property to the city if the Adjutant General determines the property to be no longer necessary for the purpose of a camp of instruction for the National Guard, and would instead authorize the department, in that instance, to dispose of the armory site, subject to specified conditions. The bill would also delete the provisions requiring the city to simultaneously convey in fee to the state the portion of the DeLaveaga Park Property that is leased to the state, and instead require the city to simultaneously quitclaim any interest it has in the armory site, subject to terms and conditions that the department deems is in the best interest of the state. The bill would authorize, rather than direct, the department to convey its fee interest to the City of Santa Cruz, but would require consultation with the Adjutant General.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
Apr 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 10, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2009 · Assembly Apr 13, 2009
How they voted
36–0
Passed
Total votes 36
Sep 9, 2009
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
4
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3351.)
lower
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0)
senate
Aug 19, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 8, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 8).
upper
Jun 15, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 4, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Apr 30, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-0-2)
assembly
Apr 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 1).
lower
Mar 17, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 17).
lower
Mar 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 11, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 240
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 240. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline