Works of improvement: progress payments: notice: retention proceeds.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires that, for private and public works of improvement, and in a public works contract, a prime contractor or subcontractor pay to any subcontractor, not later than 10 days after receipt of each progress payment, unless otherwise agreed to in writing, the respective amount allowed the contractor on account of the work performed by the subcontractors, to the extent of each contractor's interest therein, as prescribed. This bill would, instead, require that those amounts be paid not later than 7 days after receipt of each progress payment. (2) Existing law requires, with regard to a contract entered into on or after January 1, 1995, in order to enforce a claim upon any payment bond given in connection with a public work, that a claimant give the 20-day public works bond preliminary notice, as provided. Existing law further authorizes a claimant, if the 20-day public works preliminary bond notice was not given as prescribed by statute, to enforce a claim by giving written notice to the surety and the bond principal, as provided, within 15 days after recordation of a notice of completion, or if no notice of completion has been recorded, within 75 days after completion of the work of improvement. This bill would, instead, with regard to a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2011, require that the written notice to be given to the surety and the bond principal be given prior to the completion, as defined, of the project, or recordation of a notice of completion, as specified. (3) Existing law authorizes the Department of General Services, or any other department with authority to enter into contracts, to contract with suppliers for goods and services and for public works. Existing law provides that in a contract relating to the construction of a public work of improvement between the public entity and original contractor, the original contractor and a subcontractor, and in a contract between a subcontractor and any subcontractor thereunder, the percentage of retention proceeds withheld cannot exceed the percentage specified in the contract between the public entity and the original contractor. This bill would instead, until January 1, 2015, prohibit retention proceeds from exceeding 5% of the payment, as specified, for those contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2011, between a public entity, as defined, and an original contractor, between an original contractor and a subcontractor, and between all subcontractors thereunder. (4) Existing law contains various provisions relating to contracts for the performance of public works of improvement, including provisions for the payment of progress payments and the disbursing and withholding of retention proceeds. Existing law prohibits progress payments upon these contracts from being made in excess of 95% of the percentage of actual work completed plus a like percentage of the value of material delivered, as specified, and requires the Department of General Services to withhold not less than 5% of the contract price until final completion and acceptance of the project. This bill would instead prohibit progress payments upon these contracts from being made in excess of 100% of the percentage of actual work completed, and would require the Department of General Services to withhold not more than 5% of the contract price until final completion and acceptance of the project, except as specified. (5) The bill would incorporate additional changes made by SB 189 contingent upon the enactment of that bill.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2010
How they voted
37–16
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 61
Jun 1, 2010
D
Democratic37
100% Yea
R
Republican24
66% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
12
Amendments
5
Aug 31, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 31, 2010
Committee
Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 12, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jun 30, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 23, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Jun 22, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on G.O. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 21).
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and G.O.
upper
Jun 1, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (37-16-8)
assembly
May 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 19).
lower
May 4, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 29, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 28, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 27, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 26, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
AT
Alberto Torrico
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2390
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2390. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline