Emergency services and care.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the regulation of health facilities, including general acute care hospitals and acute psychiatric hospitals. A violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law requires emergency services and care to be provided to any person requesting the services or care for any condition in which the person is in danger of loss of life. For purposes of these provisions, existing law defines emergency services and care to include additional screening, examination, and evaluation by a physician, or other personnel to the extent permitted by applicable law and within the scope of their licensure and clinical privileges, to determine if a psychiatric emergency medical condition exists, as provided. This bill would define psychiatric emergency medical condition, and would, for this purpose, include admission or transfer to a psychiatric unit within a general acute care hospital or to an acute psychiatric hospital within the care and treatment of this condition. This bill would, consistent with provisions of law relating to involuntary mental health services, also allow the transfer of a patient to a psychiatric unit within a general acute care hospital or to an acute psychiatric hospital for the purpose of providing care and treatment that is solely necessary to relieve or eliminate a psychiatric emergency medical condition if, in the opinion of the treating provider, the patient's psychiatric emergency medical condition is such that, within a reasonable medical probability, no material deterioration of the patient's condition is likely to result from, or occur during, the transfer of the patient. The bill would require a provider to notify the patient's health care service plan, or the health plan's contracting medical provider, of the need for the transfer, as provided. The bill would require a hospital that transfers a patient pursuant to these provisions to seek to obtain the name and contact information of the patient's health care service plan, would require the hospital to document its attempt to ascertain this information, and would require the hospital to notify the health care service plan or the health plan's contracting medical provider of specified information related to the transfer, as provided. The bill would also require a health care service plan to provide noncontracting hospitals with its contact information, as provided, and would require health care service plans to update this information as necessary, but no less than once a year. The bill would further require the hospital to which a patient is transferred pursuant to these provisions to notify the patient's health care service plan of the transfer, as provided. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 6, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 27, 2009 · Assembly Aug 31, 2009
How they voted
30–3
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 36
Aug 27, 2009
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican13
76% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0)
assembly
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2805.)
lower
Aug 27, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-3-3)
senate
Aug 27, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (June 17).
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
May 21, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Apr 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 29).
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (March 31).
lower
Mar 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 9.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
MH
Mary Hayashi
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 235
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 235. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline