Abuse of children, elder, or dependent persons: confidentiality.
Summary
Existing law generally provides for the confidentiality of juvenile court records and records relating to the administration of public social services. However, records connected to public social services programs are generally permitted to be disclosed for purposes related to the administration of those programs and for other prescribed purposes. Under existing law, counties are authorized to establish multidisciplinary personnel teams trained in the prevention, identification, or treatment of child abuse and neglect cases, or the abuse of elder or dependent persons. Existing law provides, for purposes of the disclosure of information, that the activities of multidisciplinary teams engaged in the prevention, identification, and treatment of child abuse or the abuse of elder or dependent persons are activities performed in the administration of public social services. This bill would recast these provisions to provide that activities of multidisciplinary personnel teams engaged in the prevention, identification, management, or treatment of child abuse or neglect, or the prevention, identification, management, or treatment of the abuse of an elder or dependent person, are activities performed in the administration of public social services. Existing law provides that testimony about discussions relative to the disclosure or exchange of the information or writings during multidisciplinary personnel team meetings is not admissible in any criminal, civil, or juvenile court proceeding. Existing law also provides for the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program, under which each county provides cash assistance and other benefits to qualified low-income families. This bill would include in the definition of a multidisciplinary personnel team CalWORKs case managers, and social workers with experience or training in child abuse or neglect prevention, identification, management, or treatment. This bill would also include information relevant to the provision of child welfare services, as defined, as information that may be disclosed and exchanged by a multidisciplinary personnel team. Because the California Constitution provides that a statute excluding relevant evidence in a criminal proceeding requires a 23 vote for passage by the Legislature, this bill requires a 23 vote. Existing law permits a county to establish a computerized database system to allow provider agencies, as defined, to share specified information regarding families at risk for child abuse or neglect for the purpose of forming a multidisciplinary personnel team to prevent, identify, manage, or treat child abuse. This bill would require the database to include information about persons living in a child's home and a contact person instead of the employee assigned to the case from a provider agency. This bill would require a county that establishes this database system to install database system controls to monitor system use and to detect any violations of the system controls. This bill would in addition, with respect to the County of Los Angeles, authorize the database to include information about convictions of family members or persons living in the child's home for crimes that involved a child as a victim, as specified. Existing law requires the information obtained pursuant to the computerized database system to be kept confidential and to be used solely for the prevention, identification, management, or treatment of child abuse, child neglect, or both. This bill would permit the information to be used for the provision of child welfare services. This bill would also provide that any person knowingly and intentionally violating the above confidentiality requirements shall be subject to prescribed administrative and civil penalties. Existing law makes all information and records obtained in the course of providing intake assessment and services under statutes relating to services for persons with developmental disabilities and persons with mental illness confidential, and permits disclosure only under prescribed conditions, including, but not limited to, the courts as necessary to the administration of justice. This bill would recast some, but not all, related confidentiality provisions, to provide that the above information, if relevant to the provision of child welfare services, as defined, or the investigation, prevention, identification, management, or treatment of child abuse or neglect, may be disclosed to multidisciplinary personnel teams. This bill would also recast some, but not all, related confidentiality provisions to expressly prohibit this information from being used in a criminal or delinquency proceeding, but that evidence identical to the information contained within the records is admissible if obtained by other means as permitted by law. Existing law permits a psychotherapist, when the psychotherapist opines that a patient presents a serious danger of violence to a reasonably foreseeable victim or victims, to release mental health information or records to that person or persons, and to law enforcement agencies. This bill would recast some, but not all, related confidentiality provisions to permit a psychotherapist to release the information or records to county child welfare agencies. By imposing a higher level of service on local government this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Los Angeles. This bill would incorporate changes to Section 18961.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code made by AB 2229, to become operative only if both this bill and AB 2229 are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2011, and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2010 · Assembly Jun 1, 2010
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Aug 23, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Amendments
7
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6582.)
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Aug 23, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 10, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (August 9).
upper
Aug 5, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 30).
upper
Jun 22, 2010
Upper · Passed
Testimony taken. Hearing postponed by Committee.
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Jun 1, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0)
assembly
May 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 19).
lower
May 17, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 13, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
May 11, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 11).
lower
May 3, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 28, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Mar 11, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 6 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2322
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2322. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline