Greenhouse gas: emissions: significant effects: regional transportation plan.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. Existing law requires specified transportation planning agencies to prepare and adopt a regional transportation plan directed at achieving a coordinated and balanced regional transportation system. This bill would authorize a lead agency, in adopting a regional transportation plan for a region in which a residential or mixed-use residential project is located, to use a threshold of significance for greenhouse gas emissions adopted for the residential or mixed-use residential project by the air pollution control district or air quality management district within which the project is located to determine whether the project may have a significant effect on the environment due to the emission of greenhouse gases.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 3, 2010
How they voted
60–6
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 73
Jun 3, 2010
D
Democratic46
93% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
61% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
5
Committee
8
Amendments
4
Jun 24, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 21, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 3, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-6-7)
assembly
May 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
May 19, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 27, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 26, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 22, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 19).
lower
Apr 6, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JB
Joan Buchanan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2313
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2313. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline